| The
Wilderness Society
Jan. 10, 2002--What a difference a year makes. A year ago there was
celebration for one of the most sweeping public lands achievement of the
past century, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. There was rejoicing
for its protection of 58.5 million acres of our most treasured wildlands;
and by its implementation, the prospect for clean drinking water for
millions of Americans, safe harbor for vanishing wildlife and fish
species and immeasurable recreational opportunities for hikers, hunters,
and anglers. Yet, as we observe the first anniversary of this landmark
policy, we Americans find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of
skirmishing with an antagonistic Bush Administration to insure that our
pristine wildforests remain an enduring heritage for our children and
grandchildren.
While publicly feigning support, the Bush Administration has
surreptitiously chipped away at a reasonable and balanced policy through
a series of obscure directives. In addition, it has failed to show up in
court to defend the Rule even though Attorney General Ashcroft promised
to do just that during his confirmation hearings last winter.
It is particularly disturbing that the Administration would choose to
pursue such a zealous path against one of the most broadly popular
environmental measures in American history. Participatory democracy
shaped the Roadless Rule, confirming the value of public opinion in the
management of our public lands. More than 2 million Americans responded
when asked to comment on this policy, with at least 90% in favor of the
strongest protections possible for these pristine areas. Extensive
grassroots involvement nationwide included more than 600 public meetings
held by the Forest Service in 37 states, many on, or in communities
near, National Forests. Numerous polls, cutting across regional and
political lines, have consistently affirmed this steadfast support as
well.
So why at a time when the public has been so forthcoming in its
support of the President's fight against terrorism, is his
Administration turning a deaf ear to Americans' unwavering desire to see
the our country's natural treasures protected? Could it be to placate
those who contributed so generously to the President's 2000 campaign
coffers and stand to benefit by the policy's demise? Could it also be
that the people he has entrusted with being stewards of our natural
treasures are too close to those same special interests of logging,
mining, and oil and gas companies?
Protection of the last 30 percent of our National Forests' wildlands
is an admirable achievement for all Americans that honors future
generations and their need for open space and wild places. President
Bush should stand with the American people and implement the January 12,
2001, Roadless Area Conservation Rule. |